THE COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF ACADEMIC ADVISOR PATTERN I AND PATTERN II CONSIDERED FROM STUDENT’S INTEREST IN BUSINESS AND MANAGEMENT FACULTY OF WIDYATAMA UNIVERSITY
No Thumbnail Available
Date
2011-11-04
Authors
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Publisher
11th Annual SEAAIR Conference
Abstract
This research aims to find a student response to the academic tangible dimensions, reliability, responsiveness,
advisor system pattern I and pattern 11. The academic advisor assurance, emphaty, achievement
system is applied in particular Widyatama University Faculty
of ~usiness & Management. Trusteeship services are
provided in order to support students in determining the
direction and the right target in his education in order to
achieve complete success in a timely manner and scholarly,
with a satisfactory CAI (Cumulative Achievement Index) and
by itself will reduce the drop out students. Problem under
study is about the student response system for the
implementation of a trust that has been conducted by the
University Widyatama current (trusteeship system pattern I),
student responses to the trusteeship system of pattern 11, and
whether there are significant differences between the pattern I
trusteeship system with pattern I1 trusteeship system. This
research uses survey patterns with a sample of populations.
The results showed that the average student response to the
level of interest in the trusteeship system for pattern I
significant. This means that respondents to the trusteeship
system of pattern I viewed from the standpoint of tangible
dimensions, reliability, responsiveness, assurance and
emphaty rather important, because it is on the interval from
significant up to significant enough. While the average
response of students to the level of interest in the trusteeship
system of pattern I1 by significant. This means that the
response patterns of respondents to the trusteeship system of
pattern I1 from the perspective of tangible dimensions,
reliability, responsiveness, assurance and emphaty important,
because it is on the interval from significant up to very
significant. Further tests of significance of differences in
student responses to the trusteeship system with pattern I
pattern I1 showed is a little bit difference, with value is
significant enough. Based on this research can be concluded,
there is a significant difference between the academic advisor
pattern I and pattern 11, it is advisable for students to use the
service on the trusteeship system of pattern I1 that students
feel comfortable and satisfied, so the student can improve his
performance.
Description
Keywords
The academic advisor, the trusteeship system of pattern I, the trusteeship system of battern 11, tangible dimensions, reliability, responsiveness, assurance, emphaty, achievement