THE COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF ACADEMIC ADVISOR PATTERN I AND PATTERN II CONSIDERED FROM STUDENT’S INTEREST IN BUSINESS AND MANAGEMENT FACULTY OF WIDYATAMA UNIVERSITY

Wiludjeng, Sri; Lasmanah

THE COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF ACADEMIC ADVISOR PATTERN I AND PATTERN II CONSIDERED FROM STUDENT’S INTEREST IN BUSINESS AND MANAGEMENT FACULTY OF WIDYATAMA UNIVERSITY

dc.contributor.author	Wiludjeng, Sri
dc.contributor.author	Lasmanah
dc.date.accessioned	2014-04-25T06:12:18Z
dc.date.accessioned	2019-10-21T11:47:03Z
dc.date.available	2014-04-25T06:12:18Z
dc.date.available	2019-10-21T11:47:03Z
dc.date.issued	2011-11-04
dc.description.abstract	This research aims to find a student response to the academic tangible dimensions, reliability, responsiveness, advisor system pattern I and pattern 11. The academic advisor assurance, emphaty, achievement system is applied in particular Widyatama University Faculty of ~usiness & Management. Trusteeship services are provided in order to support students in determining the direction and the right target in his education in order to achieve complete success in a timely manner and scholarly, with a satisfactory CAI (Cumulative Achievement Index) and by itself will reduce the drop out students. Problem under study is about the student response system for the implementation of a trust that has been conducted by the University Widyatama current (trusteeship system pattern I), student responses to the trusteeship system of pattern 11, and whether there are significant differences between the pattern I trusteeship system with pattern I1 trusteeship system. This research uses survey patterns with a sample of populations. The results showed that the average student response to the level of interest in the trusteeship system for pattern I significant. This means that respondents to the trusteeship system of pattern I viewed from the standpoint of tangible dimensions, reliability, responsiveness, assurance and emphaty rather important, because it is on the interval from significant up to significant enough. While the average response of students to the level of interest in the trusteeship system of pattern I1 by significant. This means that the response patterns of respondents to the trusteeship system of pattern I1 from the perspective of tangible dimensions, reliability, responsiveness, assurance and emphaty important, because it is on the interval from significant up to very significant. Further tests of significance of differences in student responses to the trusteeship system with pattern I pattern I1 showed is a little bit difference, with value is significant enough. Based on this research can be concluded, there is a significant difference between the academic advisor pattern I and pattern 11, it is advisable for students to use the service on the trusteeship system of pattern I1 that students feel comfortable and satisfied, so the student can improve his performance.	en_US
dc.identifier.isbn	978-974-672-648-1
dc.identifier.uri	http://repository.widyatama.ac.id/handle/123456789/3132
dc.language.iso	en	en_US
dc.publisher	11th Annual SEAAIR Conference	en_US
dc.relation.ispartofseries	;KII.HC.076
dc.subject	The academic advisor	en_US
dc.subject	the trusteeship system of pattern I	en_US
dc.subject	the trusteeship system of battern 11	en_US
dc.subject	tangible dimensions	en_US
dc.subject	reliability	en_US
dc.subject	responsiveness	en_US
dc.subject	assurance	en_US
dc.subject	emphaty	en_US
dc.subject	achievement	en_US
dc.title	THE COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF ACADEMIC ADVISOR PATTERN I AND PATTERN II CONSIDERED FROM STUDENT’S INTEREST IN BUSINESS AND MANAGEMENT FACULTY OF WIDYATAMA UNIVERSITY	en_US
dc.type	Presentation	en_US