CONVENTIONAL VERSUS ISLAMIC BANKING: WHICH IS BETTER?

dc.contributor.author	Hayati, Neuneung Ratna
dc.date.accessioned	2016-03-10T01:21:42Z
dc.date.accessioned	2019-10-21T11:50:33Z
dc.date.available	2016-03-10T01:21:42Z
dc.date.available	2019-10-21T11:50:33Z
dc.date.issued	2016-02-02
dc.description.abstract	This paper aims to examine the impacts of changes in the Capital Adequacy Ratio, Asset Quality Productive, and Loan to Deposit Ratio, Return on Assets between Conventional and Islamic Banking in Indonesia. The restricted F-test and Hausman estimation model are applied and showed that The Random Effects Model is the best model to describe the relationships. The Asset Quality Productive variable does not have impact neither for Conventional nor Islamic Banking, whereas the Capital Adequacy Ratio variable shows negative impact in Islamic bank.	en_US
dc.identifier.issn	1729-9322
dc.identifier.uri	http://repository.widyatama.ac.id/handle/123456789/6741
dc.language.iso	en	en_US
dc.publisher	2016 International Conference on Business and Information - Winter Session, International Business Academics Consortium (iBAC)	en_US
dc.relation.ispartofseries	;KII.CD.0165
dc.subject	Financial Performance	en_US
dc.subject	Conventional and Islamic Banking	en_US
dc.subject	The Random Effects Approach/REM	en_US
dc.title	CONVENTIONAL VERSUS ISLAMIC BANKING: WHICH IS BETTER?	en_US
dc.type	Presentation	en_US