Browsing by Author "Wanta"

Now showing 1 - 2 of 2
  • No Thumbnail Available
    Item
    THE EFFECT OF WORK ENVIRONMENT AND WORK CULTURE ON HEALTH EMPLOYEE SATISFACTION: A STIUDY ON PUSKESMAS
    (International Journal of Psychosocial Rehabilitation, Vol. 24, Issue 1, 2020) Anggela, Flora Patricia; Wanta; Komariah, Siti
    This study entitled the effect of the work environment and work culture on job satisfaction of health workers in Puskesmas employees in Kota Baru District. The purpose of this study is to find out and analyze the work environment, work culture and job satisfaction, to know and analyze the effects simultaneously and partially. The research design in this study uses descriptive survey and explanatory methods. In this study the population was all employees in the Kotabaru sub-district, amounting to 104 people and used as a sample in the study. The analysis model used is multiple linear analysis. The analysis design used is to use scale techniques, scale range analysis, correlation coefficient test, coefficient of determination test, t test, and F test. The results of the research analysis obtained the average value of respondents' responses regarding the work environment by 420.125 (353 - 436 = Good), this means that the work environment at the Community Health Center in Kota Baru District was considered good. the average value of respondents' responses regarding work culture was 420,125 (353 - 436 = Good), this meant that the work culture at the Puskesmas in Kota Baru District was considered good. the average value of respondents' responses regarding job satisfaction was 417.67 (353 - 436 = Satisfied), this meant that job satisfaction at the Puskesmas in Kota Baru District was considered satisfied. Fcount value of 11.471 with a significance value of 0,000 (0,000 <0.05). This means that the work environment and work culture simultaneously and significantly influence job satisfaction. tcount work environment is 1,616 with a significance level of 0.109 (0.109> 0.05), this means that partially the work environment has no significant effect on job satisfaction. The tcount of work culture is 3,732 with a significance level of 0,000 (0,000 <0,05), this means that work culture partially has a significant effect on job satisfaction.
  • No Thumbnail Available
    Item
    EFFECTS OF WORK ENVIRONMENT AND LEADERSHIP STYLE ON WORK STRESS: A STUDY ON PT XXX, KARAWANG, WEST JAVA
    (International Journal of Psychosocial Rehabilitation, Vol. 24, Issue 1, 2020) Wanta; Tuhagana, Aji; Putri, Ratna Komala
    This study aims to obtain empirical evidence and find clarity of phenomena and conclusions about the influence of the work environment and leadership style on work stress in the Quality Control division at PT. XXX. The research design uses descriptive and inductive methods, namely, collect, present, analyze and test hypotheses, and make conclusions and suggestions. The results of the analysis of the research data are: 1) the correlation test of the work environment with the leadership style of 0.382 with a significance value of 0,000, meaning that the figure shows that there is a positive and significant linear relationship between the work environment and the leadership style; 2) The results of the simultaneous determination coefficient test between work environment and leadership style on work stress obtained a value of 33.8%. This means that simultaneously the work environment and leadership style affect work stress by 33.8%, while the remaining 66.2% is influenced by other factors not examined; 3) The direct effect of work environment variables on work stress variables of 0.2642 or 26.42% and the indirect effect of work environment variables through its relationship with leadership style variables of 0.0274 or 2.74%. The direct and indirect influence of 0.2916 or 29.16%; 4) The effect of leadership style variables on work stress variables is 0.0196 or 1.96% and the indirect effect of leadership style variables through its relationship with work environment variables is 0.0274 or 2.74%. So the direct and indirect influence of 0.0470 or 4.7%.