THE COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF ACADEMIC ADVISOR PATTERN I AND PATTERN II CONSIDERED FROM STUDENT’S INTEREST IN BUSINESS AND MANAGEMENT FACULTY OF WIDYATAMA UNIVERSITY

Widyatama Repository

THE COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF ACADEMIC ADVISOR PATTERN I AND PATTERN II CONSIDERED FROM STUDENT’S INTEREST IN BUSINESS AND MANAGEMENT FACULTY OF WIDYATAMA UNIVERSITY

Show full item record

Title: THE COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF ACADEMIC ADVISOR PATTERN I AND PATTERN II CONSIDERED FROM STUDENT’S INTEREST IN BUSINESS AND MANAGEMENT FACULTY OF WIDYATAMA UNIVERSITY
Author: Wiludjeng, Sri; Lasmanah
Abstract: This research aims to find a student response to the academic tangible dimensions, reliability, responsiveness, advisor system pattern I and pattern 11. The academic advisor assurance, emphaty, achievement system is applied in particular Widyatama University Faculty of ~usiness & Management. Trusteeship services are provided in order to support students in determining the direction and the right target in his education in order to achieve complete success in a timely manner and scholarly, with a satisfactory CAI (Cumulative Achievement Index) and by itself will reduce the drop out students. Problem under study is about the student response system for the implementation of a trust that has been conducted by the University Widyatama current (trusteeship system pattern I), student responses to the trusteeship system of pattern 11, and whether there are significant differences between the pattern I trusteeship system with pattern I1 trusteeship system. This research uses survey patterns with a sample of populations. The results showed that the average student response to the level of interest in the trusteeship system for pattern I significant. This means that respondents to the trusteeship system of pattern I viewed from the standpoint of tangible dimensions, reliability, responsiveness, assurance and emphaty rather important, because it is on the interval from significant up to significant enough. While the average response of students to the level of interest in the trusteeship system of pattern I1 by significant. This means that the response patterns of respondents to the trusteeship system of pattern I1 from the perspective of tangible dimensions, reliability, responsiveness, assurance and emphaty important, because it is on the interval from significant up to very significant. Further tests of significance of differences in student responses to the trusteeship system with pattern I pattern I1 showed is a little bit difference, with value is significant enough. Based on this research can be concluded, there is a significant difference between the academic advisor pattern I and pattern 11, it is advisable for students to use the service on the trusteeship system of pattern I1 that students feel comfortable and satisfied, so the student can improve his performance.
URI: http://repository.widyatama.ac.id/xmlui/handle/123456789/3132
Date: 2011-11-04


Files in this item

Files Size Format View
BIOGRAPHY PROF. DR. SARAN KAUR GILL.pdf 1.092Mb PDF View/Open
BIOGRAPHY PROF. VICHARN PANICH, MD.pdf 1.015Mb PDF View/Open
CONTENT SRI WILUDJENG + LASMANAH.pdf 3.577Mb PDF View/Open
COVER BELAKANG.pdf 2.004Mb PDF View/Open
COVER DALAM.pdf 1.000Mb PDF View/Open
COVER DEPAN.pdf 1.703Mb PDF View/Open
LOCATION CONFERENCE.pdf 2.557Mb PDF View/Open
MESSAGE FROM CONFERENCE CHAIRMAN.pdf 940.1Kb PDF View/Open
MESSAGE FROM PRESIDENT SEAAIR.pdf 1.205Mb PDF View/Open
SEAAIR EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE.pdf 993.0Kb PDF View/Open
SHCEDULE PRESENTATION.pdf 11.18Mb PDF View/Open
WELCOMING ADDRESS.pdf 968.3Kb PDF View/Open

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show full item record